The nonstandard algorithm for constructing efficient conjoint experimental designs

Authors

  • Marija Kuzmanović Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Belgrade

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/YJOR0801063K

Keywords:

conjoint analysis, experimental design, efficiency, optimality criteria, algorithm, MCON software

Abstract

Conjoint analysis is a research technique for measuring consumer preferences, and it is a method for simulating consumers' possible reactions to changes in current products or newly introduced products into an existing competitive market. One of the most critical steps in Conjoint analysis application is experimental designs construction. The purpose of an experimental design is to give a rough overall idea as to the shape of the experimental response surface, while only requiring a relatively small number of runs. These designs are expected to be orthogonal and balanced in an ideal case. In practice, though, it is hard to construct optimal designs and thus constructing of near optimal and efficient designs is carried out. There are several ways to quantify the relative efficiency of experimental designs. The choice of measure will determine which types of experimental designs are favored as well as the algorithms for choosing efficient designs. In this paper it is proposed the algorithm which combines one standard and one non-standard optimality criteria. The computational experiments were made, and results of comparison with algorithm implemented in commercial package SPSS confirm the efficiency of the proposed algorithm. .

References

*** (2001) Conjoint Value Analysis - CVA: Technical paper. Sawtooth Software, Inc., WA

Bunch, D.S., Louviere, J.J., Anderson, D.A. (1996) A comparison of experimental design strategies for choice-based conjoint analysis with generic-attribute multinomial logit models. u: Working paper, University of California at Davis - Graduate School of Management

Chrzan, K., Orme, B. (2000) An overview and comparison of design strategies for choice-based Conjoint analysis. Sawtooth Software, Inc., WA, Research Paper Series

Cook, R.D., Nachtsheim, C.J. (1980) A comparison of algorithms for constructing exact D-optimal designs. Technometrics, 22(3): 315

Gistaffson, A., Hermann, A., Huber, F. (2003) Conjoint analysis as an instrument of marketing research practice. u: Gistaffson A., A.Hermann, F.Huber [ur.] Conjoint measurement: Methods and applications, Berlin, itd: Springer Verlag

Kuhfeld, W.F. (1997) Efficient experimental designs using computerized searches. Research Paper Series SAS Institute

Kuhfeld, W.F., Tobias, R.D., Garrat, M. (1994) Efficient experimental design with marketing research applications. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(4): 545

Kuzmanovic, M., Krcevinac, S., Vukmirovic, D. (2005) The algorithms for constructing efficient experimental designs in Conjoint analysis. u: VII Balkan Conference on Operations Research, Constanca, Romania, Proceedings

Kuzmanović, M. (2006) Quantitative methods in marketing management: Application of conjoint analysis. Belgrade: Yugoslav Operations Research Society

Kuzmanović, M., Vukmirović, D. (2004) Experimental design efficiency in Conjoint analysis. u: XXXI Symposium on Operations Research, Fruška Gora, proceedings

Kuzmanović, M. (2004) Conjoint analysis and its application in customer preferences evaluation. Belgrade: Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Master Thesis

Long, C. (2002) Advanced experimental design on 'The Coordinate-Exchange Algorithm for Constructing Exact Optimal Experimental Designs'

Meyer, R.K., Nachtsheim, C.J. (1995) The coordinate-exchange algorithm for constructing exact optimal experimental designs. Technometrics, 37(1): 60

Zwerina, K., Huber, J., Kuhfeld, W.K. (1996) A general method for constructing efficient choice designs. Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Working Paper

Downloads

Published

2008-03-01

Issue

Section

Research Articles