Multicriteria optimization in a fuzzy environment: The fuzzy analytic hierarchy process

Authors

  • Milanka Gardašević-Filipović Faculty of Mathematics, Belgrade
  • Dragan Z. Šaletić University 'Union', School of Computing, Belgrade

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/YJOR1001071G

Keywords:

fuzzy decision-making, fuzzy AHP, consistency check, military application

Abstract

In the paper the fuzzy extension of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) based on fuzzy numbers, and its application in solving a practical problem, are considered. The paper advocates the use of contradictory test to check the fuzzy user preferences during fuzzy AHP decision-making process. We also propose consistency check and deriving priorities from inconsistent fuzzy judgment matrices to be included in the process, in order to check if the fuzzy approach can be applied in the AHP for the problem considered. An aggregation of local priorities obtained at different levels into composite global priorities for the alternatives based on weighted-sum method is also discussed. The contradictory fuzzy judgment matrix is analyzed. Our theoretical consideration has been verified by an application of commercially available Super Decisions program (developed for solving multi-criteria optimization problems using AHP approach) on the problem previously treated in the literature. The obtained results are compared with those from the literature. The conclusions are given and the possibilities for further work in the field are pointed out.

References

Arbel, A., Vargas, L. (1992) The analytic hierarchy process with interval judgments. u: Goicechea A., Duckstein L., Zionts S. [ur.] Multiple-criteria decision making, New York: Springer-Verlag, 61-70

Bellman, R.E., Zadeh, L.A. (1971) Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Management Science, 17, 141-B164

Belton, V., Gear, T. (1983) On a short-coming of Saaty's method of analytic hierarchies. Omega, 228-230

Belton, V., Pictet, J. (1997) A framework for group decision using a MCDA model: Sharing, aggregating or comparing individual information. J Dec Sys, 6, 283−303

Buckley, J.J. (1985) Ranking alternatives using fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 15, 1-31

Byun, B.S., Lee, K.H. (2004) A decision support system for the selection of a rapid prototyping process using the modified TOPSIS method. Int J Adv Manf Technol, 26, 1338−1347

Deng, H. (1999) Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pair wise comparison. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 21, 215-231

Dubois, D., Prade, H. (1978) Operation on fuzzy numbers. International Journal of Systems Science, 9(6) 613-626

Kaufmann, A., Gupta, M.M. (1991) Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic: Theory and application. New York: Van Nostrand

Kwiesielewicz, M., van Uden, E. (2004) Inconsistent and contradictory judgments in pairwise comparison method in the AHP. Comp. Oper. Res, 31, 713−719

Leung, L.C., Cao, D. (2003) On consistency and ranking of alternatives in fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operations Research, 124, 102−113

Mikhailov, L. (2003) Deriving priorities from fuzzy pairwise comparison judgments. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 134(3): 365

Prabhu, R.T., Vizayakumar, K. (2001) Technology choice using FHDM: A case of iron-making technology. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48(2): 209

Saaty, T.L. (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. New York, itd: McGraw-Hill

Saaty, T.L., Vargas, L.G. (1987) Uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research / EJOR, 32, 1, 107-117

Salo, A.A. (1996) On fuzzy ratio comparisons in hierarchical models. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 84(1): 21

Sambasivarao, K.V., Deshmukh, S.G. (1997) A decision support systems for selection and justification of advanced manufacturing. Production Planning & Control, 8(3): 270

Šaletić, D.Z., Velašević, D.M. (2000) Missile system selection based on the fuzzy sets theory. Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research, vol. 10, br. 1, str. 47-61

Triantaphyllou, E. (2000) Multi-criteria decision making methods: A comperative study. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers

Vaidya, O.S., Kumar, S. (2004) Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of application. Euoropean Journal of Operations Research, 4-28

van Laarhoven, P., Pedrycz, W. (1983) Fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11, 229−241

Vinod, N., Ganesh, L.S. (1996) An empirical analysis of the use of the analytic hierarchy process for estimating membership values in a fuzzy set. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 82(1): 1

Wabalickis, R.N. (1988) Justification of FMS with the analytic hierarchy process. Manf. Sys, 17, 175−182 4

Wang, Y.M., Yang, J.B., Xu, D.L. (2005) A two-stage logarithmic goal programming method for generating weights from interval comparison matrices. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 152(3): 475

Zadeh, L.A. (1965) Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, vol. 8, br. 3, str. 338-353

Zadeh, L.A. (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Information Sciences, 8 and 9

Zahedi, F. (1986) The analytic hierarchy process: A survey of the method and its applications. Interfaces, 16(4), str. 96-108

Zhu, K.J., Jing, Y., Chang, D.Y. (1999) A discussion on extent analysis method and applications of fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 116(2): 450

Downloads

Published

2010-03-01

Issue

Section

Research Articles