Evaluating total operational value and associated risks of financial holding companies in Taiwan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2298/YJOR1002275CKeywords:
financial holding companies, whole operational value, financial risk, value at risk, value-risk relation modelAbstract
This study comprises several different parts. The first part applies a normal benchmark valuation model established by Penman to assess the potential whole operational values of FHCs. The second part applies the concept of measuring financial risk as earnings variance to establish a financial risk measurement model. This model can be used to examine the degrees of financial risk before and after FHC’s establishment, and to distinguish different combinations of FHC based on risk diversion efficiency. The final part of this research constructs a new value-risk relation model that can be applied to cross-analysis for measuring total operation value of FHCs with different degrees of financial risk. Through completion of the above steps this study will demonstrate what combination of FHC offers the co-benefits of risk diversion and high whole operational value.References
Altman, I.E., Corporate Financial Distress and Bankruptcy, Wiley, New York, 1993.
Anne, B., and David, G.H., “Intra-group, interstate strategic income management for tax, financial reporting, and regulatory purpose”, The Accounting Review, 76 (2001) 515-536.
Beder, T.S., “VaR: seductive but dangerous”, Financial Analysts Journal, 51 (1995) 12-24.
Boyd, J.H., “Bank holding company merger with non-bank financial firm: effect on the risk of failure”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 17 (1993) 43-63.
Burgstahler, D., and Dichev, I., “Earnings, adaptation and equity value”, Accounting Review, 72 (1997) 187-215.
Copeland, T., Koller, T., and Murrin, J., Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies, Wiley, New York, 1994.
Cummins, J.D., Phillips, R.D., and Smith, S.D., “Derivatives and corporate risk management: participation and volume decisions in the insurance industry”, Journal of Risk and Insurance, 68 (2001) 51-91.
Demsetz, R.S., and Strahan, P.E., “Historical patterns and recent changes in the relationship between bank holding company size and risk”, Economic Policy Review, 1 (1995) 13-26.
Deng, J.L., and Guo, H., The Principle and Application of Grey Forecast Theory, Chuan Wa, Taipei, 1996.
Feltham, G.A., and Ohlson, J.A., “Valuation and clean surplus accounting for operating and financial activities”, Contemporary Accounting Research, 11 (1995) 689-731.
Gaughan, P., Mergers, Acquisitions and Corporate Restructurings, Wiley, New York, 1999.
Hendricks, D., “Evaluation of value-at-risk model using historical data”, Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 2 (1996) 39-69.
Jackson, P., Maude, D.J., and Perraudin, W., “Bank capital and value at risk”, The Journal of Derivatives, 4 (1997) 73-89.
Jerry, L.J., “Effective supervision and the evolving financial services industry”, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland. Economic Commentary, June (2001) 1-6.
Jianmin, J., and James, S.D., “A standard measure of risk and risk-value models”, Management Science, 42 (1996) 1691-1705.
Kroszner, R.S., and Rajan, R.G., “Is the Glass-steagall Act justified? A study of the U.S. experience with universal banking before 1933”, The American Economic Review, 84 (1994) 810-832.
Laderman, E.S., The Potential Diversification and Failure Reduction Benefits of Bank Expansion into Non-Banking Activities, FRB of San Francisco Working Papers, 2000.
Luciano, E., Peccati, L., and Cifarelli, D.M., “VaR as a risk measure for multiperiod static inventory models”, International Journal of Production Economics, 81-82 (2003) 375-384.
Mark, L.B., David, M.L., and Matthew, G., Intermediate Statistical Methods and Applications: A Computer Package Approach, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1983.
Mester, L.J., “Repealing Glass-steagall: the past points the way to the future, business review”, Business Review-Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, (1996) 3-18.
Penman, S.H., “Combining earnings and book value in equity valuation”, Contemporary Accounting Research, 15 (1998) 291-324.
Philippe, J., Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk, McGraw-Hill, Singapore, 2000.
Rakesh, K.S., and Martin, W., “Risk-value models”, European Journal of Operational Research, 70 (1993) 135-149.
Ross, A.S., Randolph, W.W., and Jeffrey, F.J., Corporate Finance, 6th, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2002.
Santomero, A.M., “The causes and effects of financial modernization”, Business Review Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, (2001) 1-4.
Stephen, A.R., Randolph, W.W., and Jeffrey, F.J., Corporate Finance, McGraw-Hill, Singapore, 1999.
Steven, A.H., “Toiling in King Solomon’s mine: a study in business valuation for transfer tax purposes (part II)”, Valuation of Business Interests, Taxes/ November (1998) 13-29.
Sudip, D., Mai, I.D., and Kartik, R., “Executive compensation and corporate acquisition decisions”, The Journal of Finance, 6 (2002) 2299-2336.
Thomas, J.L., and Neil, D.P., “Value at risk”, Financial Analysts Journal, 56 (2000) 47-67.
Thomson, J.B., “Unitary thrifts: a performance analysis”, Economic Review- Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, 37 (2002) 2-14.
Walsh, J.P., and Ellwood, J.W., “Mergers, acquisitions, and the pruning of managerial deadwood”, Strategic Management Journal, 12 (1991) 201-217.
West, H., “Hostile bidders, long-term performance, and restructuring methods: evidence from the UK”, American Business Review, 20 (2002) 71-81.
Westergren, B., “Risk management: a neglected aspect of M&A planning”, M&A Europe, Mar/Apr (1990) 47-52.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2010 YUJOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
