Estimating the outcome of an active phase in the military conflict on Eastern Ukraine based on the Sugeno fuzzy integral

Authors

  • Victor Bocharnikov Center for Military Strategic Studies, National Defense University of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Sergey Sveshnikov Center for Military Strategic Studies, National Defense University of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Radion Timoshenko Center for Military Strategic Studies, National Defense University of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/YJOR200918042B

Keywords:

Military conict, Decision-making, Estimation, Algorithm, Fuzzy-integral calculus

Abstract

A military conflict (especially its active phase) is a time of maximum exertion of all the powers of the state and society, a time that requires quick and correct decisions from state bodies. The quality of these decisions is largely determined by the estimation adequacy of the current situation. As the analysis shows, modern military conflicts start suddenly and develop rapidly. The official informing system turns out to be ineffective, what leads to numerous mistakes in decision-making. In addition, modern military conflicts are of a hybrid nature. The outcome of such military conflicts depends on many factors of a non-military nature, for example, the quality of governance, support from the population, international assistance. These factors are often formulated qualitatively (linguistically), and the conditions of the active phase of a military conflict do not give time to check the adequacy of quantitative data. Therefore, it is necessary that the method for estimating the outcome of the active phase takes into account the data uncertainty and ensures a generalization of the partial characteristics of the current situation. Based on the analysis of known approaches to the description and processing of uncertainty, the authors proposed using the methods of fuzzy integral calculus to describe partial characteristics and calculate a generalized characteristic, which is an estimation of the success of the outcome of an active phase. The authors have solved the following subproblems: identification of structure and parameters of standard for estimating; choice of the observation channel of the characteristics of the current situation; constructing the algorithm for estimations generalization. The authors demonstrated the work of the proposed algorithm by the example of estimating the results of hostilities in eastern Ukraine in July 2014.

References

Armed Conflict in Syria: Overview and U.S. Response, 2017, Available at: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/RL33487.pdf. Date accessed: 10 sep. 2020.

Arquilla, J., Ronfeldt, D. (eds.), Networks and Netwars. The Future of Terror, Crime, and Militancy, RAND, 2001.

Barlow, R. E., Proschan, F., Mathematical Theory of Reliability, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1965.

Bilal, M., Ayyub, George, J., Klir, Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis in Engineering and the Sciences, Published by Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2006.

Bocharnikov, V.P., Sveshnikov, S.V., Applications of fuzzy technology. The solving of analytical problems in business, Lambert Academic Publishing, Berlin, 2010.

Bozanić, D., Tešić, D., Milić, A., ”Multicriteria decision making model with Z-numbers based on FUCOM and MABAC model”, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 3 (2) (2020) 19-36.

Chen, S-M., ”Evaluating weapon systems using fuzzy arithmetic operations”, Fuzzy Sets and System, 77 (1996) 265-276.

Choquet, G., ”Theory of capacities”, Annales de l’Institut Fourier, (5) 1953.

Clancy, J., Crosset, C., ”Measuring Effectiveness in Irregular Warfare”, Parameters, 37 (2) (2007) 88-100.

Dubois, D., ”The role of fuzzy sets in decision sciences: Old techniques and new directions”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 184 (1) (2011) 13-28.

Dubois, D., Prade, H., Possibility Theory, Plenum, NY, 1988.

Dunnigan, J., The Complete Wargames Handbook, Quill, NY, 1992.

Faizi, S., Rashid, T., Salabun, W., Zafar, S., Watrobsky, J., ”Decision Making with Uncertainty Using Hesitant Fuzzy Sets”, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 20 (2) (2018) 93-103.

Feller, W., An introduction to probability theory and its applications, Vol 1, 3rd Edition, John Wiley Sons, Inc., USA, 1968.

Goldstein, J., Pevehouse, J., ”Reciprocity, Bullying, and International Cooperation: Time series Analysis of the Bosnia Conflict”, American Political Science Review, 91 (3) (1997) 515-529.

Grabisch, M., ”The application of fuzzy integrals in multicriteria decision making”, European Journal of Operational Research, 89 (3) (1996) 445-456.

Harrington, E.C., ”The Desirability Function”, Industrial Quality Control, 21 (1965) 494-498.

Hartley, D., Helmbold, R., ”Validating Lanchester’s Square Law and Other Attrition Models”, Naval Research Logistics, 42 (4) (1995) 609-633.

Hoffman, G., Conflict in the 21st century: The rise of hybrid wars, Potomac Institute for Policy Studies, Arlington, Virginia, 2007.

Kaya, I., Kahraman, C., ”Process capability analyses based on fuzzy measurements and fuzzy control charts”, Expert Systems with Applications, 38 (4) (2011) 3172-3184.

Kolmogorov, A. N., Foundations of the Theory of Probability, Second English Edition, University of Oregon, Chelsea Publishing Company, New York, 1956.

Lanchester, F., Aircraft in Warfare: the Dawn of the Fourth Arm, Constable and Co, London, UK, 1916.

Liou, James, Chuang, Yen-Ching, Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, ”A fuzzy integral-based model for supplier evaluation and improvement”, Information Sciences, 266 (2014) 199-217.

Liu, H., Deng, X., Jiang, W., ”Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy measure and fuzzy integral”, Symmetry, 9 (8) (2017) 162.

Mazumder, A., Statistical Decision Theory: Concepts, Methods and Applications, Special topics in Probabilistic Graphical Models, First Complete Draft, 2003, 164 p.

Miroshnikov, D., ”Measuring conflicts. Methodological approaches to monitoring and measurement”, Geopolitics of Ukraine: history and modern times: collection of scientific papers: Materials of international scientific-practical conference, Uzhgorod, ZakSU, 9 (2012) 207-220.

Mumford, A., ”Proxy Warfare and Future of Conflict”, The RUSI Journal, 158 (2) (2013) 40-46.

”Operation Assessment. Multi-Service Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures for Operation Assessment”, Air Land Sea Application Center, 2020.

PAMUČAR, Dragan Stevan; ČIROVIĆ, Goran; BOŽANIĆ, Darko, ”Application of Interval Valued Fuzzy-Rough Numbers in Multi-Criteria Decision Making: The IVFRN-MAIRCA Model”, Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research, 29 (2) (2019) 221-247.

Petrovic, I., Kankaras, M., ”A hybridized IT2FS-DEMATEL-AHP-TOPSIS multicriteria decision making approach: Case study of selection and evaluation of criteria for determination of air traffic control radar position”, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 3 (1) (2020) 146-164.

Precup, R.-E., Preitl, S., Petriu, E., Bojan-Dragos, C.-A., Szedlak-Stinean, A.-I., Roman, R.-C., & Hedrea, E.-L., ”Model-Based Fuzzy Control Results for Networked Control Systems”, Reports in Mechanical Engineering, 1 (1) (2020) 10-25.

Riaz, M., Cagman, N., Wali, N., Mushtaq, A., ”Certain properties of soft multi-set topology with applications in multi-criteria decision making”, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 3 (2) (2020) 70-96.

Saaty, T. L., Kearns, K. P., Analytic Planning: The organization of System, New York: Pergamon Press, 1991.

Sotire, R., ”Measuring Performance and Effectiveness in Irregular Warfare: Preventing Dysfunctional Behavior”, Joint Military Operations Department, Naval War College, Newport, 2009.

Stone, L.D., Theory of Optimal Search, N.Y.: Academic Press, 1998.

Sugeno, M., ”Fuzzy Measure and Fuzzy Integral”, Transaction of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers, 8 (1972) 95-102.

Sugeno, M., Fuzzy measures and fuzzy integrals- a survey, in: Readings in Fuzzy Sets for Intelligent Systems, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA, 1993.

Xu, Y., Li, Y., Wang, H., ”The induced intuitionistic fuzzy Einstein aggregation and its application in group decision-making”, Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 30 (1) (2013) 2-14.

Zadeh, L., ”The Concept of linguistic variable and its applications to approximate reasoning”, Information Sciences, 8 (4) (1975) 301-357.

Downloads

Published

2022-02-01

Issue

Section

Research Articles